VIPLOVE GOPIKISHAN BAJORIYA SANGRAM VIKAS SIRPURKAR (FILED IN COURT), ,DR. RENUKA SANGRAM SIRPURKAR,DHRUV SANGRAM SIRPURKAR vs THE COLLECTOR AMRAVATI AND RETURNING OFFICER FOR THE ELECTION OF LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL MAH. — WP/4467/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226, 227. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040172742026
Filing Number
WP/11745/2026
Filing Date
03-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/4467/2026
Registration Date
03-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIPLOVE GOPIKISHAN BAJORIYA SANGRAM VIKAS SIRPURKAR (FILED IN COURT), ,DR. RENUKA SANGRAM SIRPURKAR,DHRUV SANGRAM SIRPURKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE COLLECTOR AMRAVATI AND RETURNING OFFICER FOR THE ELECTION OF LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL MAH.
Adv. ,RISHIKESH M. MARDIKAR,RAHUL M BHANGDE,ATHARVA S. MANOHAR,VIREN VINAY JOSHI 1123
Case History
-
03-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
—
-
03-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
Case Summary: WP 4467/2026 Outcome: Interim relief petition rejected; case adjourned to 17 June 2026. The petitioner's nomination form for Maharashtra Legislative Council Elections 2026 was rejected by the Returning Officer for non-compliance with Rule 4-A of the Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961. The Court held that Form 26 requires all details in specified columns without annexures, and the petitioner's submission of information through 27-page annexures (pages 12-27) without verification at the end does not meet statutory requirements. The Court rejected the interim relief request, finding that accepting the nomination would not sub-serve the election process and that court interference during active elections is unwarranted absent compelling circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4467/2026
Case Summary: WP 4467/2026 Outcome: Interim relief petition rejected; case adjourned to 17 June 2026. The petitioner's nomination form for Maharashtra Legislative Council Elections 2026 was rejected by the Returning Officer for non-compliance with Rule 4-A of the Conduct of Elections Rules, 1961. The Court held that Form 26 requires all details in specified columns without annexures, and the petitioner's submission of information through 27-page annexures (pages 12-27) without verification at the end does not meet statutory requirements. The Court rejected the interim relief request, finding that accepting the nomination would not sub-serve the election process and that court interference during active elections is unwarranted absent compelling circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts