NETAJI MITARAM KHOTELE A.M. CHANDEKAR (FILED IN COURT), ,SANDEEP NARESH SINGH,RUSHIKESH RAVINDRA MADDALWAR,GANESH G. AMRUTKAR vs THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. THR. SUPE. ENGINEER AND ANR. — WP/4468/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040172432026
Filing Number
WP/11726/2026
Filing Date
02-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/4468/2026
Registration Date
03-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NETAJI MITARAM KHOTELE A.M. CHANDEKAR (FILED IN COURT), ,SANDEEP NARESH SINGH,RUSHIKESH RAVINDRA MADDALWAR,GANESH G. AMRUTKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. THR. SUPE. ENGINEER AND ANR.
-
2.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DEPT. (O AND M), MAHA. STATE ELECTRICITY, BHANDARA
Case History
-
05-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
—
-
05-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. KhubalkarView PDF
Case Summary: In WP/4468/2026 before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, the petition filed by Netaji Mitaram Khotele and others against Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. was heard on 5th June 2026. The court issued notice to the respondents returnable on 12.06.2026 and permitted the petitioner to serve respondents through private mode in addition to regular service, with an affidavit of service to be filed by the next date. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4468/2026
Case Summary: In WP/4468/2026 before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court, the petition filed by Netaji Mitaram Khotele and others against Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. was heard on 5th June 2026. The court issued notice to the respondents returnable on 12.06.2026 and permitted the petitioner to serve respondents through private mode in addition to regular service, with an affidavit of service to be filed by the next date. The case was adjourned for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts