SHUDDHODHAN BHIMRAO KAMBLE AND OTHERS vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, RURAL DEV. DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS Advocate - NALIN MAJITHIA, ,KHYATI N. MAJITHIA,(FOR R — WP/4434/2026

Case under The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section 226. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Next hearing 29-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040172072026

Filing Number

WP/11712/2026

Filing Date

30-May-2026

Registration No

WP/4434/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section 226
Service Matter
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHUDDHODHAN BHIMRAO KAMBLE AND OTHERS

    Adv. PRADEEP SHANTARAM KSHIRSAGAR, (FILED IN COURT)

  2. 2.GAUTAM MADHUKARRAO WAGHMARE

  3. 3.SURESH BHAURAO VYAVAHARE

  4. 4.SUKHDEV KISAN PHOPSE

  5. 5.SHASHANK BABURAO BHARNE

  6. 6.MANOHAR GANGARAM RATHOD

  7. 7.MAHENDRA KISAN KOLHE

  8. 8.PARMESHWAR RAMDAS KHANDARE

  9. 9.BABA VITTHAL DHAVAS

  10. 10.ISHWAR GANPAT WADASKAR

  11. 11.MAHESH GAUTAMRAO SUTRAVE

  12. 12.SANGEETA SADASHIV KHANDARE

  13. 13.MOHAN PURUSHOTTAM THAKARE

  14. 14.PRAVIN GULABRAO LONDHE

  15. 15.VINOD MADHAVRAO SHERKI

  16. 16.MAROTI DASHRATH JIVTODE

  17. 17.GAJANAN NARAYAN BHAGA

  18. 18.SANJIV KAVDU RAJURKAR

  19. 19.JYOTI PANDITRAO DHALE

  20. 20.GAJANAN BALKRISHNA TURARE

  21. 21.HARSHADA BRAMHADEV CHOPANE

  22. 22.KISHOR KIGAMBAR TATKONDAWAR

  23. 23.GOPALKRISHNA PUNDLIKRAO SHIRPURKAR

  24. 24.HEMRAJ NARAYAN RANGARI

  25. 25.SURESH SHRIRAM BADKHAL

  26. 26.SANTOSH SHAMRAO ATRAM

  27. 27.ARVIND SUDHAKAR TATEWAR

  28. 28.VAISHALI SAHEBRAOJI NIMJE

  29. 29.GAJANAN DIGAMBAR KHARATE

  30. 30.SUDHAKAR SHRIRAM RAUT

  31. 31.GANESH MADHUKARRAO VITHALKAR

  32. 32.PRASHANT ASHOK KARNEWAR

  33. 33.SANJAY KISAN BHARTI

  34. 34.NASIRALI MOHAMMAD ALI BHATI

  35. 35.SHISHUPAL RAMPRASAD JAISWAL

  36. 36.SANTOSH SHANKARRAO MARGADE

  37. 37.RAJESH BHAGWAN JUNGHARE

  38. 38.KIRAN ANANDRAO MANKAR

  39. 39.SANJAY MADHUKAR JAWALKAR

  40. 40.KU. MANJUSHA SANTOSH NAHATE

  41. 41.SANTOSH RAMKRISHNA GHYAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, RURAL DEV. DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS Advocate - NALIN MAJITHIA, ,KHYATI N. MAJITHIA,(FOR R

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (PRIMARY), STATE OF MAHA. PUNE

  3. 3.THE ZILLA PARISHAD, YAVATMAL, THR. ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, YAVATMAL

  4. 4.THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, YAVATMAL

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    For Orders-Service Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. VyasView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 4434/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed an intervenor application on June 11, 2026, adding the applicants as party respondents to the writ petition. The court adjourned the main petition to June 29, 2026, with respondents directed to file replies by June 18, 2026, and rejoinders by June 23, 2026. Meanwhile, the Zilla Parishad was permitted to continue the promotion process but prohibited from declaring results until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

  6. 30-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4434/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 4434/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed an intervenor application on June 11, 2026, adding the applicants as party respondents to the writ petition. The court adjourned the main petition to June 29, 2026, with respondents directed to file replies by June 18, 2026, and rejoinders by June 23, 2026. Meanwhile, the Zilla Parishad was permitted to continue the promotion process but prohibited from declaring results until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case