DINESH SHASNKAR ZADKHANDE AND OTHERS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/4433/2026
Case under The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section 226. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM040172052026
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
WP/11710/2026
Filing Date
30-05-2026
Registration No
WP/4433/2026
Registration Date
30-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA
Coram
HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DINESH SHASNKAR ZADKHANDE AND OTHERS
Adv. ANAND PARCHURE,(FILED IN COURT), ,PRASHANT PRABHAKAR THAKARE,(FILED IN COURT)
DINESH NILKANTHARAO KHODKE
SURESH INDRAJEET ALOKAR
SHIRISH GANESHRAO MEHARE
ANIL PUNJU YEWALE
KHEMRAJ LAXMAN AKOKAR
NILESH MOHANDAS BADOTKAR
VIJAY KALYA BELKAR
KU. BABITA MAHADEO DURGE
GAJANAN HARICHARAN ATHAWALE
HARSHA SAHDEO ALOKAR
PRAMILA KADAM BELKAR
KU. PRATIBHA KISHORE HARSULE
TUSHAR KHEMRAJ TIWARI
RUPESH RUPLAL METKAR
ANIL MOTIRAM RAJANE
YUVRAJ UDERAM DISANDARE
KU. KAVITA DAYARAMJI UKEY (BAGADE)
KU. BHARTI KASHINATH BAGHE (PURBHE)
KU. PRANJALI PRABHAKARO AHMADABADE (INGLE)
RAMDAS WALMIK MUNDE
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, MUMBAI AND ORS.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS, MUMBAI
THE COMMISSIONER (EDUCATION) MAHA. STATE, PUNE
DIVISIONAL DY, DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, AMRAVATI REGION, AMRAVATI
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, AMRAVATI
THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY) ZILLA PARISHAD, AMRAVATI REGION
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE URMILA JOSHI PHALKE , HON'BLE JUSTICE NIVEDITA PRAKASH MEHTA
FOR ORDERS (-CIVIL SIDE MATTERS-)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | |
| 06-07-2026 | FOR ORDERS (-CIVIL SIDE MATTERS-) |
Orders
Case Summary: In WP 4433/2026, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) found that respondents 5 and 6 were served through alternative mode rather than court service. The court adjourned the matter and re-listed it for hearing on 06-07-2026 to ensure proper service of all respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In WP 4433/2026, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) found that respondents 5 and 6 were served through alternative mode rather than court service. The court adjourned the matter and re-listed it for hearing on 06-07-2026 to ensure proper service of all respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts