KUNDAN S/O BHASKAR BIBEKAR vs MUNICIPAL COUNCIL / NAGAR PARISHAD, DARWHA, THR. ITS CHIEF OFFICER, YAVATMAL — WP/4411/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040171512026
Filing Number
WP/11689/2026
Filing Date
28-May-2026
Registration No
WP/4411/2026
Registration Date
28-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KUNDAN S/O BHASKAR BIBEKAR
Adv. JEMINI BRIJMOHAN KASAT,(FILED IN COURT), (FILED IN COURT)
-
2.MAHINDRA S/O NAGINDAS BAJANIA
-
3.PADMA W/O MAHINDRA BAJANIA
-
4.VIJAY S/O VITHHALRAO TAJNE
-
5.KAMAR JAHAN W/O MEHMOOD KHAN
-
6.SEWALAL S/O GANGARAM PANCHOLI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUNICIPAL COUNCIL / NAGAR PARISHAD, DARWHA, THR. ITS CHIEF OFFICER, YAVATMAL
Case History
-
29-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
—
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
Summary: The High Court at Bombay, Nagpur Bench granted an interim status quo order in favor of the petitioners. The court directed the Municipal Council of Darwha to maintain the status quo regarding the petitioners' construction on Plot Nos. 16, 17, 20, and 21 in Survey No. 146 until the next hearing on 15.06.2026. The petitioners challenged an encroachment removal notice dated 19.05.2026, establishing through documentary evidence (N.A. Order from 1982 and registered sale deeds) that they lawfully owned the surveyed plots in a sanctioned layout, making the municipal notice unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4411/2026
Summary: The High Court at Bombay, Nagpur Bench granted an interim status quo order in favor of the petitioners. The court directed the Municipal Council of Darwha to maintain the status quo regarding the petitioners' construction on Plot Nos. 16, 17, 20, and 21 in Survey No. 146 until the next hearing on 15.06.2026. The petitioners challenged an encroachment removal notice dated 19.05.2026, establishing through documentary evidence (N.A. Order from 1982 and registered sale deeds) that they lawfully owned the surveyed plots in a sanctioned layout, making the municipal notice unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts