DURGA SINGH S/O HATTU SINGH JADHAV AND ORS vs MUNICIPAL COUNCIL / NAGAR PARISHAD, DARWHA, THR. ITS CHIEF OFFICER, YAVATMAL — WP/4410/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040171502026
Filing Number
WP/11688/2026
Filing Date
28-May-2026
Registration No
WP/4410/2026
Registration Date
28-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DURGA SINGH S/O HATTU SINGH JADHAV AND ORS
Adv. JEMINI BRIJMOHAN KASAT,(FILED IN COURT), (FILED IN COURT)
-
2.SHYAM S/O KRISHNARAO MONGILRWAR
-
3.AMIT S/O KRISHNARAO GULHANE
-
4.NITIN S/O PURSHOTTAMJI BHUTADA
-
5.MITHUN S/O DHANNALAL CHOUDHARY
-
6.MAHADEO S/O BAPURAO KALE
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUNICIPAL COUNCIL / NAGAR PARISHAD, DARWHA, THR. ITS CHIEF OFFICER, YAVATMAL
Case History
-
29-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
—
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
WP 4410/2026 Summary: The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court issued a notice to the Municipal Council, Darwha, returnable on 15.06.2026, in response to petitioners' challenge against an encroachment removal notice dated 19.05.2026 regarding Survey No.146. The Court granted an interim status quo order, directing the respondent to maintain the construction on petitioners' plots (13 and 14) until the returnable date, finding the petitioners' contentions regarding their registered ownership of lawfully developed plots to be prima facie sustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4410/2026
WP 4410/2026 Summary: The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court issued a notice to the Municipal Council, Darwha, returnable on 15.06.2026, in response to petitioners' challenge against an encroachment removal notice dated 19.05.2026 regarding Survey No.146. The Court granted an interim status quo order, directing the respondent to maintain the construction on petitioners' plots (13 and 14) until the returnable date, finding the petitioners' contentions regarding their registered ownership of lawfully developed plots to be prima facie sustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts