BIRDICHAND S/O BHIKAMCHAND BHARUT AND OTHERS vs MUNICIPAL COUNCIL/NAGAR PARISHAD, DARWHA, THR. ITS CHIEF OFFICER — WP/4409/2026
Case under Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act (Maharashtra) Section 226. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040171492026
Filing Number
WP/11687/2026
Filing Date
28-May-2026
Registration No
WP/4409/2026
Registration Date
28-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIRDICHAND S/O BHIKAMCHAND BHARUT AND OTHERS
Adv. JEMINI BRIJMOHAN KASAT,(FILED IN COURT), (FILED IN COURT)
-
2.SUBHASHCHAND S/O LAKHMICHAND CHORDIA
-
3.MANOHAR S/O KONDBAJI JADHAV
-
4.MAHINDRA S/O NAGINDAS BAJANIA
-
5.YOGENDRA S/O RAMDAS YELNE
-
6.NILAWANTRAJ S/O SAWANTRAJ KOTHARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUNICIPAL COUNCIL/NAGAR PARISHAD, DARWHA, THR. ITS CHIEF OFFICER
Case History
-
29-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
—
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
Case Summary: WP/4409/2026 The Nagpur High Court issued notice to the Municipal Council of Darwha on a petition challenging an encroachment removal notice dated 19.05.2026. The petitioners, who hold registered sale deeds for plots in a sanctioned layout on Survey No.146, argued the notice was unsustainable as the land was privately owned agricultural land converted into a legal layout. The court granted an interim status quo order, restraining the respondent from taking action against the petitioners' construction on the disputed plots until the next hearing on 15.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4409/2026
Case Summary: WP/4409/2026 The Nagpur High Court issued notice to the Municipal Council of Darwha on a petition challenging an encroachment removal notice dated 19.05.2026. The petitioners, who hold registered sale deeds for plots in a sanctioned layout on Survey No.146, argued the notice was unsustainable as the land was privately owned agricultural land converted into a legal layout. The court granted an interim status quo order, restraining the respondent from taking action against the petitioners' construction on the disputed plots until the next hearing on 15.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts