ANAND UDAYNARAYAN SINGH vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, HOME DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI, THR. ITS SECRETARY AND ORS. — WP/4396/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040171252026
Filing Number
WP/11675/2026
Filing Date
27-May-2026
Registration No
WP/4396/2026
Registration Date
27-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANAND UDAYNARAYAN SINGH
Adv. SAYAJEE S. JAGTAP,(FILED IN COURT), ,S.S. GODBOLE,(FILED IN COURT)
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, HOME DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI, THR. ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.
-
2.THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (NAGPUR URBAN), NAGPUR
-
3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, (HEAD OFFICE), NAGPUR
-
4.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, (HUMAN RESOURCES), NAGPUR
Case History
-
29-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) partially granted the writ petition filed by Anand Udaynarayan Singh challenging a 7-day eviction notice from the Police Control Room Canteen. The court extended the vacate deadline from 29.05.2026 to 12.06.2026, allowing the petitioner an additional 15 days to vacate the premises, which he had operated under contract since 2019. The petitioner was permitted to participate in future tender processes for the canteen contract. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
—
-
27-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4396/2026
The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) partially granted the writ petition filed by Anand Udaynarayan Singh challenging a 7-day eviction notice from the Police Control Room Canteen. The court extended the vacate deadline from 29.05.2026 to 12.06.2026, allowing the petitioner an additional 15 days to vacate the premises, which he had operated under contract since 2019. The petitioner was permitted to participate in future tender processes for the canteen contract. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts