MOBIN AHAMAD MOHAMMAD RAFIQUE SHEIKH vs SAMREEN MOBIN AHAMAD SHEIKH (SAMREEN D/O. ABDUL SAMAD SHEIKH) — WP/4387/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040171212026
Next Hearing
29th May 2026
Filing Number
WP/11671/2026
Filing Date
27-05-2026
Registration No
WP/4387/2026
Registration Date
27-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOBIN AHAMAD MOHAMMAD RAFIQUE SHEIKH
Adv. DIPESH N. MEHTA,SANKET ARUN DETHE,SANKET ARUN DETHE, AVANI D. MEHTA,(FILED IN COURT),SANKET ARUN DETHE
Respondent(s)
SAMREEN MOBIN AHAMAD SHEIKH (SAMREEN D/O. ABDUL SAMAD SHEIKH)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-06-2026 |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/4387/2026 Case: Mobin Ahamad Mohammad Rafique Sheikh vs. Samreen Mobin Ahamad Sheikh (Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench) Outcome: The writ petition was adjourned to 10.06.2026 with a stay granted on the Family Court's impugned order dated 15.05.2026 directing temporary child custody transfer to the mother. Justice Raj D. Wakode expressed concern that the Family Court completely ignored a child interaction report showing the child (Hammad) feared and refused contact with his mother, instead wanting to remain with his father. The respondent-mother was granted time to file a reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/4387/2026 Case: Mobin Ahamad Mohammad Rafique Sheikh vs. Samreen Mobin Ahamad Sheikh (Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench) Outcome: The writ petition was adjourned to 10.06.2026 with a stay granted on the Family Court's impugned order dated 15.05.2026 directing temporary child custody transfer to the mother. Justice Raj D. Wakode expressed concern that the Family Court completely ignored a child interaction report showing the child (Hammad) feared and refused contact with his mother, instead wanting to remain with his father. The respondent-mother was granted time to file a reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts