MOBIN AHAMAD MOHAMMAD RAFIQUE SHEIKH vs SAMREEN MOBIN AHAMAD SHEIKH (SAMREEN D/O. ABDUL SAMAD SHEIKH) — WP/4387/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM040171212026

Next Hearing

29th May 2026

Filing Number

WP/11671/2026

Filing Date

27-05-2026

Registration No

WP/4387/2026

Registration Date

27-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Family Court Act

Petitioner(s)

MOBIN AHAMAD MOHAMMAD RAFIQUE SHEIKH

Adv. DIPESH N. MEHTA,SANKET ARUN DETHE,SANKET ARUN DETHE, AVANI D. MEHTA,(FILED IN COURT),SANKET ARUN DETHE

Respondent(s)

SAMREEN MOBIN AHAMAD SHEIKH (SAMREEN D/O. ABDUL SAMAD SHEIKH)

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

13-06-2026

Orders

29-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Case Summary: WP/4387/2026 Case: Mobin Ahamad Mohammad Rafique Sheikh vs. Samreen Mobin Ahamad Sheikh (Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench) Outcome: The writ petition was adjourned to 10.06.2026 with a stay granted on the Family Court's impugned order dated 15.05.2026 directing temporary child custody transfer to the mother. Justice Raj D. Wakode expressed concern that the Family Court completely ignored a child interaction report showing the child (Hammad) feared and refused contact with his mother, instead wanting to remain with his father. The respondent-mother was granted time to file a reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4387/2026 Case: Mobin Ahamad Mohammad Rafique Sheikh vs. Samreen Mobin Ahamad Sheikh (Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench) Outcome: The writ petition was adjourned to 10.06.2026 with a stay granted on the Family Court's impugned order dated 15.05.2026 directing temporary child custody transfer to the mother. Justice Raj D. Wakode expressed concern that the Family Court completely ignored a child interaction report showing the child (Hammad) feared and refused contact with his mother, instead wanting to remain with his father. The respondent-mother was granted time to file a reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case