DHIRAJ TARUN NANDESHWAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR A.C.B. BRANCH, NAGPUR — APPA/376/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc). Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040171122026

Filing Number

APPA/5443/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

APPA/376/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHIRAJ TARUN NANDESHWAR

    Adv. M.V. ACHARYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR A.C.B. BRANCH, NAGPUR

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

    Case Summary: APPA/376/2026 Outcome: The Criminal Application for suspension of sentence was allowed. The High Court suspended Dhiraj Tarun Nandeshwar's sentence under Sections 7 and 13[1][d] of the Prevention of Corruption Act pending final appeal disposal. He was convicted and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment (Section 7) and two years rigorous imprisonment (Section 13[1][d]), with Rs. 10,000 fine for each. The appellant was released on bail upon furnishing a P.R. Bond of Rs. 50,000 with one surety, considering the short-term nature of the sentence and the Rs. 20,000 fine already deposited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

  5. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPA/376/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: APPA/376/2026 Outcome: The Criminal Application for suspension of sentence was allowed. The High Court suspended Dhiraj Tarun Nandeshwar's sentence under Sections 7 and 13[1][d] of the Prevention of Corruption Act pending final appeal disposal. He was convicted and sentenced to one year rigorous imprisonment (Section 7) and two years rigorous imprisonment (Section 13[1][d]), with Rs. 10,000 fine for each. The appellant was released on bail upon furnishing a P.R. Bond of Rs. 50,000 with one surety, considering the short-term nature of the sentence and the Rs. 20,000 fine already deposited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case