KU. ROHINI AVINASH WADIBHASME vs THE REGISTRAR (ADMINISTRATION), HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR AND OTHERS Advocate - AMIT M. KUKDAY, (FOR RESPONDENTS) — WP/4408/2026

Case under Service Matter Section 226,227. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM040170832026

Next Hearing

29th May 2026

Filing Number

WP/11654/2026

Filing Date

26-05-2026

Registration No

WP/4408/2026

Registration Date

28-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Service Matter Section 226,227
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

KU. ROHINI AVINASH WADIBHASME

Adv. N.S. WARULKAR,SWAROOP K. BHATTACHARYA,SWAROOP K. BHATTACHARYA, ,SWAROOP K. BHATTACHARYA

Respondent(s)

THE REGISTRAR (ADMINISTRATION), HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR AND OTHERS Advocate - AMIT M. KUKDAY, (FOR RESPONDENTS)

THE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY-CUM-REGISTRAR (ADMINISTRATION), NAGPUR

THE INQUIRY AUTHORITY (DY. REGISTRAR III), HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

16-06-2026

Orders

29-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Case Summary: In WP 4408/2026, the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard the petition filed by Kum. Rohini Avinash Wadibhasme against the Registrar (Administration) and others. The Court issued notice to respondents returnable on 10/06/2026, with respondents' counsel waiving service. The petitioner is permitted to file an adjournment application to be decided by respondent No.3 on merit and in accordance with law. The case stands adjourned pending further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WP 4408/2026, the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard the petition filed by Kum. Rohini Avinash Wadibhasme against the Registrar (Administration) and others. The Court issued notice to respondents returnable on 10/06/2026, with respondents' counsel waiving service. The petitioner is permitted to file an adjournment application to be decided by respondent No.3 on merit and in accordance with law. The case stands adjourned pending further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Service Matter Constitution of India All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case