KU. ROHINI AVINASH WADIBHASME vs THE REGISTRAR (ADMINISTRATION), HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR AND OTHERS Advocate - AMIT M. KUKDAY, (FOR RESPONDENTS) — WP/4408/2026
Case under Service Matter Section 226,227. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040170832026
Filing Number
WP/11654/2026
Filing Date
26-May-2026
Registration No
WP/4408/2026
Registration Date
28-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KU. ROHINI AVINASH WADIBHASME
Adv. N.S. WARULKAR,SWAROOP K. BHATTACHARYA,SWAROOP K. BHATTACHARYA, ,SWAROOP K. BHATTACHARYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE REGISTRAR (ADMINISTRATION), HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR AND OTHERS Advocate - AMIT M. KUKDAY, (FOR RESPONDENTS)
-
2.THE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY-CUM-REGISTRAR (ADMINISTRATION), NAGPUR
-
3.THE INQUIRY AUTHORITY (DY. REGISTRAR III), HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Case History
-
29-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
—
-
29-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
Case Summary: In WP 4408/2026, the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard the petition filed by Kum. Rohini Avinash Wadibhasme against the Registrar (Administration) and others. The Court issued notice to respondents returnable on 10/06/2026, with respondents' counsel waiving service. The petitioner is permitted to file an adjournment application to be decided by respondent No.3 on merit and in accordance with law. The case stands adjourned pending further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4408/2026
Case Summary: In WP 4408/2026, the High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard the petition filed by Kum. Rohini Avinash Wadibhasme against the Registrar (Administration) and others. The Court issued notice to respondents returnable on 10/06/2026, with respondents' counsel waiving service. The petitioner is permitted to file an adjournment application to be decided by respondent No.3 on merit and in accordance with law. The case stands adjourned pending further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts