SHAHZAD ABID ALI SAYYAD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO PS RAJURA DIST CHANDRAPUR — ABA/437/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040169742026

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

ABA/5405/2026

Filing Date

25-05-2026

Registration No

ABA/437/2026

Registration Date

26-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 406,408,420,437,468,471,34

Petitioner(s)

SHAHZAD ABID ALI SAYYAD

Adv. ABDUL SUBHAN

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO PS (Police Station) RAJURA DIST CHANDRAPUR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL

08-06-2026
12-06-2026

ABA (AFTER NOTICE)

10-06-2026

ABA (AFTER NOTICE)

Orders

12-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL

Summary: ABA/437/2026 Outcome: Anticipatory bail GRANTED with conditions. The court rejected the prosecution's demand for custody and instead granted protection to all applicants (directors and treasurer of a cooperative society) on the condition they attend police station every Saturday-Sunday (11 AM–1 PM) and cooperate with investigation until chargesheet filing. Key Issue: Directors were accused of misappropriating cooperative society funds by sanctioning illegal loans to non-members and deceased persons. The court found their role limited to signing resolutions, deemed custody unnecessary, and imposed attendance and non-obstruction conditions instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: ABA/437/2026 Outcome: Anticipatory bail GRANTED with conditions. The court rejected the prosecution's demand for custody and instead granted protection to all applicants (directors and treasurer of a cooperative society) on the condition they attend police station every Saturday-Sunday (11 AM–1 PM) and cooperate with investigation until chargesheet filing. Key Issue: Directors were accused of misappropriating cooperative society funds by sanctioning illegal loans to non-members and deceased persons. The court found their role limited to signing resolutions, deemed custody unnecessary, and imposed attendance and non-obstruction conditions instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case