SHAHZAD ABID ALI SAYYAD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO PS RAJURA DIST CHANDRAPUR — ABA/437/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040169742026
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
ABA/5405/2026
Filing Date
25-05-2026
Registration No
ABA/437/2026
Registration Date
26-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAHZAD ABID ALI SAYYAD
Adv. ABDUL SUBHAN
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO PS (Police Station) RAJURA DIST CHANDRAPUR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL
ABA (AFTER NOTICE)
ABA (AFTER NOTICE)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | |
| 12-06-2026 | ABA (AFTER NOTICE) |
| 10-06-2026 | ABA (AFTER NOTICE) |
Orders
Summary: ABA/437/2026 Outcome: Anticipatory bail GRANTED with conditions. The court rejected the prosecution's demand for custody and instead granted protection to all applicants (directors and treasurer of a cooperative society) on the condition they attend police station every Saturday-Sunday (11 AM–1 PM) and cooperate with investigation until chargesheet filing. Key Issue: Directors were accused of misappropriating cooperative society funds by sanctioning illegal loans to non-members and deceased persons. The court found their role limited to signing resolutions, deemed custody unnecessary, and imposed attendance and non-obstruction conditions instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: ABA/437/2026 Outcome: Anticipatory bail GRANTED with conditions. The court rejected the prosecution's demand for custody and instead granted protection to all applicants (directors and treasurer of a cooperative society) on the condition they attend police station every Saturday-Sunday (11 AM–1 PM) and cooperate with investigation until chargesheet filing. Key Issue: Directors were accused of misappropriating cooperative society funds by sanctioning illegal loans to non-members and deceased persons. The court found their role limited to signing resolutions, deemed custody unnecessary, and imposed attendance and non-obstruction conditions instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts