SHAHZAD ABID ALI SAYYAD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO PS RAJURA DIST CHANDRAPUR — ABA/437/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040169742026
Filing Number
ABA/5405/2026
Filing Date
25-May-2026
Registration No
ABA/437/2026
Registration Date
26-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAHZAD ABID ALI SAYYAD
Adv. ABDUL SUBHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO PS (Police Station) RAJURA DIST CHANDRAPUR
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. PatilView PDF
Summary: ABA/437/2026 Outcome: Anticipatory bail GRANTED with conditions. The court rejected the prosecution's demand for custody and instead granted protection to all applicants (directors and treasurer of a cooperative society) on the condition they attend police station every Saturday-Sunday (11 AM–1 PM) and cooperate with investigation until chargesheet filing. Key Issue: Directors were accused of misappropriating cooperative society funds by sanctioning illegal loans to non-members and deceased persons. The court found their role limited to signing resolutions, deemed custody unnecessary, and imposed attendance and non-obstruction conditions instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
Aba (After Notice)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. PatilView PDF
-
10-Jun-2026
Aba (After Notice)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. Patil
-
08-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pravin S. PatilView PDF
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
-
25-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. ABA/437/2026
Summary: ABA/437/2026 Outcome: Anticipatory bail GRANTED with conditions. The court rejected the prosecution's demand for custody and instead granted protection to all applicants (directors and treasurer of a cooperative society) on the condition they attend police station every Saturday-Sunday (11 AM–1 PM) and cooperate with investigation until chargesheet filing. Key Issue: Directors were accused of misappropriating cooperative society funds by sanctioning illegal loans to non-members and deceased persons. The court found their role limited to signing resolutions, deemed custody unnecessary, and imposed attendance and non-obstruction conditions instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts