NANDKISHOR S/O RAMCHANDRA KHURANA AND OTHERS vs NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THR. COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR AND OTHERS Advocate - MUNISH R. PERKE, ,SPARSH M. BHONDEKAR,SAYYAD SHOAIB ALI,BANSOD MANSI VILAS,SANJANA AJAY RAUT,(FOR R — CAW/1236/2026
Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --C.A. Disposed off on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040169612026
Filing Number
CAW/11562/2026
Filing Date
25-May-2026
Registration No
CAW/1236/2026
Registration Date
25-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--C.A. Disposed off
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NANDKISHOR S/O RAMCHANDRA KHURANA AND OTHERS
Adv. SHASHANK M. AGRAWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THR. COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR AND OTHERS Advocate - MUNISH R. PERKE, ,SPARSH M. BHONDEKAR,SAYYAD SHOAIB ALI,BANSOD MANSI VILAS,SANJANA AJAY RAUT,(FOR R
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Jun-2026
—
-
08-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
The Nagpur High Court bench dismissed an application by Respondent No. 3 seeking recall/modification of the court's 04.05.2026 order. The court found that the applicant's sole ground—lack of hearing before the order—was unfounded, as the previous order merely directed the Nagpur Municipal Corporation Authority to decide the petitioners' pending representation, without deciding the matter on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
-
25-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CAW/1236/2026
The Nagpur High Court bench dismissed an application by Respondent No. 3 seeking recall/modification of the court's 04.05.2026 order. The court found that the applicant's sole ground—lack of hearing before the order—was unfounded, as the previous order merely directed the Nagpur Municipal Corporation Authority to decide the petitioners' pending representation, without deciding the matter on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts