NANDKISHOR S/O RAMCHANDRA KHURANA AND OTHERS vs NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THR. COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR AND OTHERS Advocate - MUNISH R. PERKE, ,SPARSH M. BHONDEKAR,SAYYAD SHOAIB ALI,BANSOD MANSI VILAS,SANJANA AJAY RAUT,(FOR R — CAW/1236/2026

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --C.A. Disposed off on 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040169612026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

13th June 2026

Filing Number

CAW/11562/2026

Filing Date

25-05-2026

Registration No

CAW/1236/2026

Registration Date

25-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

--C.A. Disposed off

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

NANDKISHOR S/O RAMCHANDRA KHURANA AND OTHERS

Adv. SHASHANK M. AGRAWAL

Respondent(s)

NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THR. COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR AND OTHERS Advocate - MUNISH R. PERKE, ,SPARSH M. BHONDEKAR,SAYYAD SHOAIB ALI,BANSOD MANSI VILAS,SANJANA AJAY RAUT,(FOR R

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

13-06-2026
08-06-2026

FOR ORDER -

Orders

08-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

The Nagpur High Court bench dismissed an application by Respondent No. 3 seeking recall/modification of the court's 04.05.2026 order. The court found that the applicant's sole ground—lack of hearing before the order—was unfounded, as the previous order merely directed the Nagpur Municipal Corporation Authority to decide the petitioners' pending representation, without deciding the matter on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Nagpur High Court bench dismissed an application by Respondent No. 3 seeking recall/modification of the court's 04.05.2026 order. The court found that the applicant's sole ground—lack of hearing before the order—was unfounded, as the previous order merely directed the Nagpur Municipal Corporation Authority to decide the petitioners' pending representation, without deciding the matter on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case