SAHADEO SHANKARRAO PALASPAGAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., YEVADA, TQ. DARYAPUR DIST. AMRAVATI — ABA/421/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 11th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040169482026

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

26th May 2026

Filing Number

ABA/5392/2026

Filing Date

25-05-2026

Registration No

ABA/421/2026

Registration Date

25-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

ANTICIPATORY BAIL ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

11th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 438
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 117(2),352,105

Petitioner(s)

SAHADEO SHANKARRAO PALASPAGAR

Adv. DATTARAM N. MUDGALE,RAHUL HEMANT KADUSKAR,RAHUL HEMANT KADUSKAR, ,RAHUL HEMANT KADUSKAR

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., YEVADA, TQ. DARYAPUR DIST. AMRAVATI

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL

26-05-2026
11-06-2026

ABA (FRESH)

Orders

11-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAVIN S. PATIL

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed Sahadeo Shankarrao Palaspagar's criminal application for ad-interim protection, noting that while Section 105 BNS 2023 (culpable homicide) was added after the complainant's husband died on 17.04.2026, the complainant herself stated no injury occurred on the incident date (25.02.2026) and took him home instead of hospital. The court granted protection subject to conditions including weekly police station attendance, which the applicant satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed Sahadeo Shankarrao Palaspagar's criminal application for ad-interim protection, noting that while Section 105 BNS 2023 (culpable homicide) was added after the complainant's husband died on 17.04.2026, the complainant herself stated no injury occurred on the incident date (25.02.2026) and took him home instead of hospital. The court granted protection subject to conditions including weekly police station attendance, which the applicant satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case