CHAITANYA SECURITY FORCE THR ITS PROPRIETOR RAJESH S/O TUKARAM MULE vs THE AUTHORITY UNDER THE MINIMUM WAGES ACT, 1948 AND THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR Advocate - PIYUSH REWATKAR, ,ANKIT A. VASTANI,ADV. FOR INTERVENOR — APPP/1723/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040169022026
e-Filing Number
11-05-2026
Filing Number
APPP/5368/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
APPP/1723/2026
Registration Date
22-May-2026
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHAITANYA SECURITY FORCE THR ITS PROPRIETOR RAJESH S/O TUKARAM MULE
Adv. ATUL JAYANT PATHAK,SHARAD NARAYAN DANDEKAR,SHARAD NARAYAN DANDEKAR, ,SHARAD NARAYAN DANDEKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE AUTHORITY UNDER THE MINIMUM WAGES ACT, 1948 AND THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR Advocate - PIYUSH REWATKAR, ,ANKIT A. VASTANI,ADV. FOR INTERVENOR
-
2.THE DAGA MEMORIAL GOVERNMENT WOMEN AND CHILDREN HOSPITAL
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF
Summary of Case APPP/1723/2026 The criminal application sought permission for a trade union (Rashtriya Abhiyantriki and Tantraniketan Karmachari Sangh, Nagpur) to intervene and be impleaded as respondent in the minimum wages dispute involving Chaitanya Security Force. The court granted the intervention application, finding the trade union had sufficient interest as it espouses the cause of its members involved in the matter. The applicant was directed to add the trade union as non-applicant no.3 within two weeks, and the application was allowed and disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
—
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. APPP/1723/2026
Summary of Case APPP/1723/2026 The criminal application sought permission for a trade union (Rashtriya Abhiyantriki and Tantraniketan Karmachari Sangh, Nagpur) to intervene and be impleaded as respondent in the minimum wages dispute involving Chaitanya Security Force. The court granted the intervention application, finding the trade union had sufficient interest as it espouses the cause of its members involved in the matter. The applicant was directed to add the trade union as non-applicant no.3 within two weeks, and the application was allowed and disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts