CHAITANYA SECURITY FORCE THR ITS PROPRIETOR RAJESH S/O TUKARAM MULE vs THE AUTHORITY UNDER THE MINIMUM WAGES ACT 1948 AND THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR Advocate - PIYUSH REWATKAR, ,ANKIT A. VASTANI,ADV. FOR INTERVENOR — APPP/1724/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 512. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Next hearing 10-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040168902026

e-Filing Number

11-05-2026

Filing Number

APPP/5364/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

APPP/1724/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 512

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHAITANYA SECURITY FORCE THR ITS PROPRIETOR RAJESH S/O TUKARAM MULE

    Adv. ATUL JAYANT PATHAK,SHARAD NARAYAN DANDEKAR,SHARAD NARAYAN DANDEKAR, ,SHARAD NARAYAN DANDEKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE AUTHORITY UNDER THE MINIMUM WAGES ACT 1948 AND THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR Advocate - PIYUSH REWATKAR, ,ANKIT A. VASTANI,ADV. FOR INTERVENOR

  2. 2.THE DAGA MEMORIAL GOVERNMENT WOMEN AND CHILDREN HOSPITAL

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. W. ChandwaniView PDF

    Case Summary: APPP/1724/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed a trade union's application seeking permission to intervene and be impleaded as a respondent in a minimum wages dispute involving Chaitanya Security Force. The court granted the intervention, finding the trade union had legitimate interest as it espouses members' causes. The union was added as non-applicant no.3, with necessary amendments to be completed within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    —

  4. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPP/1724/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: APPP/1724/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) allowed a trade union's application seeking permission to intervene and be impleaded as a respondent in a minimum wages dispute involving Chaitanya Security Force. The court granted the intervention, finding the trade union had legitimate interest as it espouses members' causes. The union was added as non-applicant no.3, with necessary amendments to be completed within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case