JAYASWAL NECO INDUSTRIES LTD. THR. AUTH. OFFICER YOGESH VYAWAHARE vs THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, NAGPUR AND ANR. — WP/4584/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040167862026

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/11454/2026

Filing Date

20-05-2026

Registration No

WP/4584/2026

Registration Date

11-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Income Tax Act, 1961

Petitioner(s)

JAYASWAL NECO INDUSTRIES LTD. THR. AUTH. OFFICER YOGESH VYAWAHARE

Adv. ATHARVA S. MANOHAR,VIREN VINAY JOSHI,VIREN VINAY JOSHI, ,VIREN VINAY JOSHI

Respondent(s)

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, NAGPUR AND ANR.

THE DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2 (

, NAGPUR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

25-06-2026

Orders

12-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Case Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) in WP 4584/2026 heard Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd.'s writ petition against the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax, Nagpur. On 12th June 2026, the court issued notice to respondents returnable on 19th June 2026, with service waived by respondents' counsel. The case was adjourned for further hearing; office objections must be removed by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) in WP 4584/2026 heard Jayaswal Neco Industries Ltd.'s writ petition against the Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax, Nagpur. On 12th June 2026, the court issued notice to respondents returnable on 19th June 2026, with service waived by respondents' counsel. The case was adjourned for further hearing; office objections must be removed by the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case