RAJ SUNIL SAHU vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRINCIPAL SECY., STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/4482/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040167742026

Filing Number

WP/11443/2026

Filing Date

19-May-2026

Registration No

WP/4482/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Other Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ SUNIL SAHU

    Adv. SHRIRAM SATISH CHOPDE,ABHISHEK SUDHIR PATRIKAR,ABHISHEK SUDHIR PATRIKAR, ,ABHISHEK SUDHIR PATRIKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRINCIPAL SECY., STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS.

  2. 2.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. COMMISSIONER STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT MUMBAI

  3. 3.COLLECTOR (STATE ECICESE), AMRAVATI

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: WP 4482/2026 The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Raj Sunil Sahu against the State of Maharashtra and others on 09th June 2026. The Court found the petition had no surviving issues after the State's AGP assured the Court that Revision Application No. 3 of 2026 under Section 138 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 would be decided within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4482/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: WP 4482/2026 The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Raj Sunil Sahu against the State of Maharashtra and others on 09th June 2026. The Court found the petition had no surviving issues after the State's AGP assured the Court that Revision Application No. 3 of 2026 under Section 138 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 would be decided within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case