MS. KANCHAN SANTOSHRAO DESHMUKH vs RASHTRASANT TUKDOJI MAHARAJ NAGPUR UNIVERSITY, THR. REGISTRAR — WP/4492/2026

Case under Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016(Mah. Act No. Vi of 2017) Section 226. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

CNR: HCBM040167192026

Next Hearing

08th July 2026

Filing Number

WP/11405/2026

Filing Date

18-05-2026

Registration No

WP/4492/2026

Registration Date

04-06-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016(Mah. Act No. Vi of 2017) Section 226
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

MS. KANCHAN SANTOSHRAO DESHMUKH

Adv. BHANUDAS GOPALDAS KULKARNI,SHAILESH NAMDEO SHENDE,SHAILESH NAMDEO SHENDE, ,SHAILESH NAMDEO SHENDE

Respondent(s)

RASHTRASANT TUKDOJI MAHARAJ NAGPUR UNIVERSITY, THR. REGISTRAR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

16-06-2026
08-07-2026

FRESH ADMISSION (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)

Orders

09-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Case Summary: In WP/4492/2026, the High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) issued notice to Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University on the petition filed by Ms. Kanchan Santoshrao Deshmukh, with the return date set for 08.07.2026. The petitioner is permitted to serve the respondent by both private and regular modes of service, with an affidavit of service to be filed by the next date; failure to do so would result in a cost deposit of ₹500. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WP/4492/2026, the High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) issued notice to Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University on the petition filed by Ms. Kanchan Santoshrao Deshmukh, with the return date set for 08.07.2026. The petitioner is permitted to serve the respondent by both private and regular modes of service, with an affidavit of service to be filed by the next date; failure to do so would result in a cost deposit of ₹500. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case