MS. KANCHAN SANTOSHRAO DESHMUKH vs RASHTRASANT TUKDOJI MAHARAJ NAGPUR UNIVERSITY, THR. REGISTRAR — WP/4492/2026
Case under Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016(Mah. Act No. Vi of 2017) Section 226. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM040167192026
Filing Number
WP/11405/2026
Filing Date
18-May-2026
Registration No
WP/4492/2026
Registration Date
04-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MS. KANCHAN SANTOSHRAO DESHMUKH
Adv. BHANUDAS GOPALDAS KULKARNI,SHAILESH NAMDEO SHENDE,SHAILESH NAMDEO SHENDE, ,SHAILESH NAMDEO SHENDE
Respondent(s)
-
1.RASHTRASANT TUKDOJI MAHARAJ NAGPUR UNIVERSITY, THR. REGISTRAR
Case History
-
08-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jul-2026
Fresh Admission (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
-
16-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
Case Summary: In WP/4492/2026, the High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) issued notice to Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University on the petition filed by Ms. Kanchan Santoshrao Deshmukh, with the return date set for 08.07.2026. The petitioner is permitted to serve the respondent by both private and regular modes of service, with an affidavit of service to be filed by the next date; failure to do so would result in a cost deposit of ₹500. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4492/2026
Case Summary: In WP/4492/2026, the High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) issued notice to Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur University on the petition filed by Ms. Kanchan Santoshrao Deshmukh, with the return date set for 08.07.2026. The petitioner is permitted to serve the respondent by both private and regular modes of service, with an affidavit of service to be filed by the next date; failure to do so would result in a cost deposit of ₹500. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts