NILESH BALAKDAS LOLUSARE AND OTHERS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECY., URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/4580/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 11th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040165732026
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/11302/2026
Filing Date
14-05-2026
Registration No
WP/4580/2026
Registration Date
10-06-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
11th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NILESH BALAKDAS LOLUSARE AND OTHERS
Adv. U. P. DABLE, ,RAGHAV A. BHANDAKKAR
SHRI SACHIN SANJAYRAO PATIL
SOU. KIRAN W/O SACHIN MEGHARE
SHRI. UTTAM S/O MAHADEORAO ROKDE
SOU. PRIYANKA VISHAL KHAIRE
SHRI MILIND DINANATH BORGAONKAR
SHRI AMIT KUSUMAKAR BHAISE
SHRI RAKESH SHAMRAO BHENDARE
SANJAY BABURAOJI TILGULE
SHRI SUNIL MADHUKAR SAWARBANDHE
SHRI PAWAN MADHUKAR SAWARBANDHE
SHRI SACHIN DASHRATH GOKHARE
SHRI PRAKASH PANDURNAG TAVLE
SHRI PRASHANT HARIBHAU KHAVAS
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECY., URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS.
NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR. PLANNING OFFICER, NAGPUR
NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST THR. COMMISSIONER
SHRI ROSHAN BIRAL PATIL
SHRI VIJAY WASUDEORAOJI ITANKAR
SHRI VIVEK VIJAYRAO ITANKAR
SHRI SATISH SANTOSHRAO PATIL
SHRI SUNIL SRIPAT BODI
SUNIL SATISH SHAHU
SHRI HARISHCHANDRA KRISHNARAO IKHAR
SHRI RAJESH CHINCHUJI KAVLE
SHRI PRAKASH HARICHANDRA MONDHE
NAGORAO KRISHNARAO IKHAR
SHRI UMESH UDDHAV PAYADALWAR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-06-2026 |
Orders
The High Court directed the competent authorities (Nagpur Municipal Corporation and Nagpur Improvement Trust) to decide the petitioners' representations within eight weeks, after the authorities failed to act on complaints that sanctioned layout maps lacked mandatory open and public utility spaces required under the Unified Development Control and Promotion Regulations, 2020. The court disposed of the petition with directions to decide the representations on merit after hearing all necessary parties, with decisions to be communicated within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court directed the competent authorities (Nagpur Municipal Corporation and Nagpur Improvement Trust) to decide the petitioners' representations within eight weeks, after the authorities failed to act on complaints that sanctioned layout maps lacked mandatory open and public utility spaces required under the Unified Development Control and Promotion Regulations, 2020. The court disposed of the petition with directions to decide the representations on merit after hearing all necessary parties, with decisions to be communicated within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts