NILESH BALAKDAS LOLUSARE AND OTHERS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECY., URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/4580/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 25-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040165732026

Filing Number

WP/11302/2026

Filing Date

14-May-2026

Registration No

WP/4580/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Bombay Municipal Corporation Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NILESH BALAKDAS LOLUSARE AND OTHERS

    Adv. U. P. DABLE, ,RAGHAV A. BHANDAKKAR

  2. 2.SHRI SACHIN SANJAYRAO PATIL

  3. 3.SOU. KIRAN W/O SACHIN MEGHARE

  4. 4.SHRI. UTTAM S/O MAHADEORAO ROKDE

  5. 5.SOU. PRIYANKA VISHAL KHAIRE

  6. 6.SHRI MILIND DINANATH BORGAONKAR

  7. 7.SHRI AMIT KUSUMAKAR BHAISE

  8. 8.SHRI RAKESH SHAMRAO BHENDARE

  9. 9.SANJAY BABURAOJI TILGULE

  10. 10.SHRI SUNIL MADHUKAR SAWARBANDHE

  11. 11.SHRI PAWAN MADHUKAR SAWARBANDHE

  12. 12.SHRI SACHIN DASHRATH GOKHARE

  13. 13.SHRI PRAKASH PANDURNAG TAVLE

  14. 14.SHRI PRASHANT HARIBHAU KHAVAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECY., URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS.

  2. 2.NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR. PLANNING OFFICER, NAGPUR

  3. 3.NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST THR. COMMISSIONER

  4. 4.SHRI ROSHAN BIRAL PATIL

  5. 5.SHRI VIJAY WASUDEORAOJI ITANKAR

  6. 6.SHRI VIVEK VIJAYRAO ITANKAR

  7. 7.SHRI SATISH SANTOSHRAO PATIL

  8. 8.SHRI SUNIL SRIPAT BODI

  9. 9.SUNIL SATISH SHAHU

  10. 10.SHRI HARISHCHANDRA KRISHNARAO IKHAR

  11. 11.SHRI RAJESH CHINCHUJI KAVLE

  12. 12.SHRI PRAKASH HARICHANDRA MONDHE

  13. 13.NAGORAO KRISHNARAO IKHAR

  14. 14.SHRI UMESH UDDHAV PAYADALWAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    The High Court directed the competent authorities (Nagpur Municipal Corporation and Nagpur Improvement Trust) to decide the petitioners' representations within eight weeks, after the authorities failed to act on complaints that sanctioned layout maps lacked mandatory open and public utility spaces required under the Unified Development Control and Promotion Regulations, 2020. The court disposed of the petition with directions to decide the representations on merit after hearing all necessary parties, with decisions to be communicated within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4580/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court directed the competent authorities (Nagpur Municipal Corporation and Nagpur Improvement Trust) to decide the petitioners' representations within eight weeks, after the authorities failed to act on complaints that sanctioned layout maps lacked mandatory open and public utility spaces required under the Unified Development Control and Promotion Regulations, 2020. The court disposed of the petition with directions to decide the representations on merit after hearing all necessary parties, with decisions to be communicated within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case