THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRINCIPAL SECY., WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS. vs M/S D. THAKKAR CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD., THR. CHAIRMAN OF MONITORING COMM. R. R. KANOONGO — WP/4449/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040164792026

e-Filing Number

07-05-2026

Filing Number

WP/11244/2026

Filing Date

12-May-2026

Registration No

WP/4449/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
The Commercial Courts,commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act,2015
C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRINCIPAL SECY., WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, MUMBAI AND ORS.

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

  2. 2.VIDARBHA IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (VIDC), THR. EX. DIRECTOR, NAPGUR

  3. 3.CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, AMRAVATI

  4. 4.SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (UPPER WARDHA IRRIGATION CIRCLE), AMRAVATI

  5. 5.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (AMRAVATI MEDIUM PROJECT DIVISION), AMRAVATI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S D. THAKKAR CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD., THR. CHAIRMAN OF MONITORING COMM. R. R. KANOONGO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rohit Wasudeo JoshiView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/4449/2026 The High Court at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed Maharashtra State's writ petition challenging a District Court order that refused to permit filing a written statement beyond the 120-day deadline under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court rejected the State's argument that administrative exigencies and its status as a government party warranted an extension, holding that the Commercial Courts Act applies uniformly to all litigants regardless of whether they are state or non-state parties, and the Commercial Court lacked jurisdiction to extend the statutory deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4449/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4449/2026 The High Court at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) dismissed Maharashtra State's writ petition challenging a District Court order that refused to permit filing a written statement beyond the 120-day deadline under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court rejected the State's argument that administrative exigencies and its status as a government party warranted an extension, holding that the Commercial Courts Act applies uniformly to all litigants regardless of whether they are state or non-state parties, and the Commercial Court lacked jurisdiction to extend the statutory deadline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case