SHRI. PRADIP S/O PANDHARI JOGI AND ANOTHER vs WESTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED (WCL), THR. CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, NAGPUR AND ORS. — WP/4262/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040164372026
Filing Number
WP/11208/2026
Filing Date
11-May-2026
Registration No
WP/4262/2026
Registration Date
19-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHRI. PRADIP S/O PANDHARI JOGI AND ANOTHER
Adv. S. R. CHAKRAVARTI,RADHA M MISHRA,RADHA M MISHRA, ,RADHA M MISHRA
-
2.KU. SAKSHI D/O PRADIP JOGI
Respondent(s)
-
1.WESTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED (WCL), THR. CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, NAGPUR AND ORS.
-
2.WESTERN COAL FIELDS LIMITED, CHANDRAPUR, THR. CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER
-
3.THE COLLECTOR, CHANDRAPUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
—
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition by directing the Chief General Manager of WCL, Majri Area, Chandrapur to decide the petitioners' representation dated 04/12/2025 within eight weeks, with the decision to be communicated within two weeks thereafter. The court intervened to address the delay in deciding the representation that had remained pending since December 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4262/2026
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition by directing the Chief General Manager of WCL, Majri Area, Chandrapur to decide the petitioners' representation dated 04/12/2025 within eight weeks, with the decision to be communicated within two weeks thereafter. The court intervened to address the delay in deciding the representation that had remained pending since December 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts