M/S. G.K. POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY PVT. LTD., THR. MANAGING DIRECTOR, NAGPUR vs THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, NAGPUR, THR. ITS REGISTRAR AND OTHERS — WP/4066/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 06-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040162402026

Filing Number

WP/11045/2026

Filing Date

08-May-2026

Registration No

WP/4066/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226,227
Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act
Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act
Right to Information Act, 2005

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. G.K. POWER TRANSMISSION COMPANY PVT. LTD., THR. MANAGING DIRECTOR, NAGPUR

    Adv. U. P. DABLE,PAYAL K. LUNAWAT,PAYAL K. LUNAWAT, ,PAYAL K. LUNAWAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, NAGPUR, THR. ITS REGISTRAR AND OTHERS

  2. 2.BANK OF BARODA, NAGPUR, THR. BRANCH MANAGER

  3. 3.MR. ROBIN JOSEPH BABY S/O K. BABY

  4. 4.MR. MADHUKAR S/O SHIVAJI MOWADE

  5. 5.MR. ASHISH HARISH SHUKLA

  6. 6.MR. AMIT S/O BRIJENDRA NARAYAN PATHAK

  7. 7.MR. HARIOM S/O PRADEEP CHACHADA

  8. 8.MR. SURESH S/O BRIJAL JAISWAL

  9. 9.M/S NAGRAJ STEEL SCRAP, NAGPUR, THR. AUTH. PERSON

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/4066/2026 The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench disposed of the writ petition by clarifying that while the DRT was permitted to consolidate interim applications with the main securitization hearing, it must decide the interim applications first. The Court directed that if proceedings are decided adversely to the petitioner, the order shall be stayed for 15 days to enable appeal to DRAT, Mumbai. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4066/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4066/2026 The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench disposed of the writ petition by clarifying that while the DRT was permitted to consolidate interim applications with the main securitization hearing, it must decide the interim applications first. The Court directed that if proceedings are decided adversely to the petitioner, the order shall be stayed for 15 days to enable appeal to DRAT, Mumbai. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case