SANKET S/O ANIL MULEWAR AND OTHERS. vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO SAKKARDARA POLICE STATION DIST NAGPUR AND ANR. — APPP/1658/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 26-May-2026

CNR: HCBM040160002026

e-Filing Number

06-05-2026

Filing Number

APPP/5127/2026

Filing Date

06-May-2026

Registration No

APPP/1658/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANKET S/O ANIL MULEWAR AND OTHERS.

    Adv. SHRUSHTI SHAHAKAR,ADV. FOR APPLICANT NO. 1 TO 3,ADV. FOR APPLICANT NO. 1 TO 3, ,RITESH N. BADHE,SAKSHI D. KALE,ADV. FOR APPLICANT NO. 1 TO

  2. 2.KALPANA WD/O ANIL MULEWAR

    Adv. Shrushti Shahakar

  3. 3.SANCHITA W/O PANKAJ KURHEWAR

    Adv. Shrushti Shahakar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO SAKKARDARA POLICE STATION DIST NAGPUR AND ANR.

  2. 2.HARSHITA W/O SANKET MULEWAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    —

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. JoshiView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) granted the applicants' petition to serve non-applicant No.2 (Harshita W/O Sanket Mulewar) through paper publication after Speed Post service failed due to insufficient address. The court permitted alternative service via newspaper publication after electronic service had already been attempted and completed. The underlying criminal application was adjourned to be heard after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPP/1658/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) granted the applicants' petition to serve non-applicant No.2 (Harshita W/O Sanket Mulewar) through paper publication after Speed Post service failed due to insufficient address. The court permitted alternative service via newspaper publication after electronic service had already been attempted and completed. The underlying criminal application was adjourned to be heard after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case