ADITYA MEGHASHYAM PANDHARE AND ANOTHER vs ABHISHEK ANAND AND OTHERS — WP/4118/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040159342026
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/10827/2026
Filing Date
06-05-2026
Registration No
WP/4118/2026
Registration Date
12-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ADITYA MEGHASHYAM PANDHARE AND ANOTHER
Adv. HIMANSHU A. KHEDIKAR
MS. BHAGYASHRI VITTHALRAO SHASTRI
Respondent(s)
ABHISHEK ANAND AND OTHERS
MRS. ANITA DEVI
THE MOBILE GALLERY, NAGPUR
CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LTD., THR. AUTH. OFFICER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-06-2026 |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/4118/2026 The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Aditya Meghashyam Pandhare and others seeking expeditious adjudication of Regular Appeal No. 155 of 2026 pending before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai. The court granted the petitioners liberty to file an application before the Tribunal for early hearing on a fixed date, with a direction that the Tribunal must consider and decide such application within one week of filing, in accordance with law and on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/4118/2026 The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition filed by Aditya Meghashyam Pandhare and others seeking expeditious adjudication of Regular Appeal No. 155 of 2026 pending before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai. The court granted the petitioners liberty to file an application before the Tribunal for early hearing on a fixed date, with a direction that the Tribunal must consider and decide such application within one week of filing, in accordance with law and on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts