PRAJAKTA ANAND MISTRI AND OTHERS vs UNION OF INDIA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS (MHA), NEW DELHI AND ORS. — CAW/1165/2026
Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --C.A. Disposed off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040158482026
Filing Number
CAW/10768/2026
Filing Date
06-May-2026
Registration No
CAW/1165/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--C.A. Disposed off
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAJAKTA ANAND MISTRI AND OTHERS
Adv. T. D. MANDLEKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS (MHA), NEW DELHI AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Jun-2026
—
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) granted interim relief to petitioners—an education society running an unaided minority school—challenging their appointment as Census Enumerators and Supervisors for Census 2027. The court found that under the Census Act, 1948, only government staff and local authority employees can be requisitioned for census work, and private school employees cannot be compulsorily appointed. The court held the Charge Officer's communication directing the school to provide employee information for census work appeared prima facie contrary to legal provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CAW/1165/2026
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) granted interim relief to petitioners—an education society running an unaided minority school—challenging their appointment as Census Enumerators and Supervisors for Census 2027. The court found that under the Census Act, 1948, only government staff and local authority employees can be requisitioned for census work, and private school employees cannot be compulsorily appointed. The court held the Charge Officer's communication directing the school to provide employee information for census work appeared prima facie contrary to legal provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts