MANOJ KUMAR JAYASWAL S/O. BASANTILAL SHAW vs ICICI BANK LIMITED, MUMBAI AND OTHERS — WP/4038/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040158212026
Filing Number
WP/10744/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
WP/4038/2026
Registration Date
07-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANOJ KUMAR JAYASWAL S/O. BASANTILAL SHAW
Adv. AMOD R. BHOLE,CHETAN S. DHORE,CHETAN S. DHORE, ,CHETAN S. DHORE
Respondent(s)
-
1.ICICI BANK LIMITED, MUMBAI AND OTHERS
-
2.STATE BANK OF INDIA, SARG COMMERCIAL-III, MUMBAI
-
3.CANARA BANK LIMITED, BANGALORE
-
4.PUNJAB AND SIND BANK, ASSET RECOVERY BRANCH, NEW DELHI
-
5.HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, (HUDCO), PATNA
-
6.PHOENIX ARC PRIVATE LIMITED, MUMBAI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Jun-2026
—
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition challenging ICICI Bank's show cause notice dated 23.03.2026. The petitioner had already submitted a reply but failed to raise the jurisdictional ground against the bank. The court allowed the petitioner to file an additional reply raising jurisdictional objections and directed ICICI Bank to reconsider the show cause notice after considering both replies and relevant Supreme Court precedent, with any adverse order kept in abeyance for seven days to permit further challenge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4038/2026
Case Summary: The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) disposed of the writ petition challenging ICICI Bank's show cause notice dated 23.03.2026. The petitioner had already submitted a reply but failed to raise the jurisdictional ground against the bank. The court allowed the petitioner to file an additional reply raising jurisdictional objections and directed ICICI Bank to reconsider the show cause notice after considering both replies and relevant Supreme Court precedent, with any adverse order kept in abeyance for seven days to permit further challenge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts