RAJESH S/O LACHHU KRIPLANI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, BOMBAY HIGH COURT, NAGPUR BENCH AND ORS. — WP/4082/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040158182026
Filing Number
WP/10741/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
WP/4082/2026
Registration Date
08-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESH S/O LACHHU KRIPLANI
Adv. JITESH S. DUHILANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER, BOMBAY HIGH COURT, NAGPUR BENCH AND ORS.
-
2.THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRAR AND CONTROLLER OF STAMPS, PUNE
-
3.THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND DEPUTY CONTROLLER OF STAMPS NAGPUR
-
4.JOINT DISTRICT REGISTRAR AND COLLECTOR OF STAMPS, NAGPUR CITY
-
5.JOINT SUB REGISTRAR CLASS-2, NAGPUR
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
Fresh Admission (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
-
08-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
Case Summary: The writ petition filed by Rajesh S/o. Lachhu Kriplani against the State of Maharashtra and others was heard on 8th June 2026. The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) found that the impugned order was passed by a Quasi-Judicial Authority under a Local Act and consequently transferred the matter to the learned Single Judge for proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4082/2026
Case Summary: The writ petition filed by Rajesh S/o. Lachhu Kriplani against the State of Maharashtra and others was heard on 8th June 2026. The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) found that the impugned order was passed by a Quasi-Judicial Authority under a Local Act and consequently transferred the matter to the learned Single Judge for proper adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts