PRAKASH S/O GULAB DAWE AND ANOTHER vs WESTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, NAGPUR, THR. ITS CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANR. Advocate - PUSHKAR GHARE, (FOR R — WP/4056/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 02nd July 2026.
CNR: HCBM040158162026
Filing Number
WP/10739/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
WP/4056/2026
Registration Date
07-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRAKASH S/O GULAB DAWE AND ANOTHER
Adv. PRASHANT VIJAYRAO THAKRE,VIJAYA P THAKRE,VIJAYA P THAKRE, ,VIJAYA P THAKRE
-
2.BABA S/O GULAB DAWE
Respondent(s)
-
1.WESTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, NAGPUR, THR. ITS CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR AND ANR. Advocate - PUSHKAR GHARE, (FOR R
-
2.AREA GENERAL MANAGER, WESTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED, NAGPUR
Case History
-
02-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
02-Jul-2026
Fresh Admission-Lar Matters
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
-
06-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
Case Summary: WP/4056/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, issued notice to Western Coalfields Limited and other respondents, returnable on 02.07.2026. Petitioners were permitted to serve remaining respondents via private mode of service in addition to regular service, with an affidavit of service required by the next date or face a cost deposit of Rs. 500. The matter stands adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4056/2026
Case Summary: WP/4056/2026 The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, issued notice to Western Coalfields Limited and other respondents, returnable on 02.07.2026. Petitioners were permitted to serve remaining respondents via private mode of service in addition to regular service, with an affidavit of service required by the next date or face a cost deposit of Rs. 500. The matter stands adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts