SHYAM VASANT KALE AND ANOTHER vs THE LEARNED ASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER- II, NAGPUR AND OTHERS — WP/4116/2026

Case under Bombay Public Trust Act Section 226,227. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM040158142026

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/10737/2026

Filing Date

05-05-2026

Registration No

WP/4116/2026

Registration Date

12-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Bombay Public Trust Act Section 226,227
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

SHYAM VASANT KALE AND ANOTHER

Adv. SHREEGANESH DHANANJAY ABHYANKAR,GOPAL H. SHARMA,GOPAL H. SHARMA, ,GOPAL H. SHARMA

SHRI. VIJAY JANARDHAN BHAT

Respondent(s)

THE LEARNED ASSISTANT CHARITY COMMISSIONER- II, NAGPUR AND OTHERS

Adv. ,DIPTI V. KHANORKAR (TIDKE) 1123

SHRI. RAMCHANDRA KRUSHNARAO KELAPURE

SAU. SWATI CHINTMAN SATHE

SHRI. VISHAL VILASRAO DESHPANDE

SHRI. SHAKAL PRAKASH SHUKLA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

06-06-2026
10-06-2026

FRESH ADMISSION (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)

Orders

08-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE

Case Summary: In Writ Petition No. 4116/2026 before the Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench, the petition filed by Shyam Vasant Kale and another against the Assistant Charity Commissioner-II, Nagpur was adjourned to June 10, 2026. Respondents 2 and 3 filed a caveat but did not appear in court; the petitioners' counsel was directed to serve a copy of the petition to the caveators' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Writ Petition No. 4116/2026 before the Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench, the petition filed by Shyam Vasant Kale and another against the Assistant Charity Commissioner-II, Nagpur was adjourned to June 10, 2026. Respondents 2 and 3 filed a caveat but did not appear in court; the petitioners' counsel was directed to serve a copy of the petition to the caveators' counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case