MEHTAR SAMAJ MAGASWARGIYA SARVANGIN VIKAS SANSTHA, DIGRAS, PRESIDENT, RAVI R. KALOSE vs STATE OF MAHA., THR. ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECY., DEPT. OF TRANSPORT AND PORTS, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/3950/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-May-2026

CNR: HCBM040158082026

Filing Number

WP/10731/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

WP/3950/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Other Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MEHTAR SAMAJ MAGASWARGIYA SARVANGIN VIKAS SANSTHA, DIGRAS, PRESIDENT, RAVI R. KALOSE

    Adv. SAMEER M. KHAN,FAISAL SHAH,FAISAL SHAH, ,PARESH SURESHSINGH THAKUR,SHAAD FIRDOS MIRZA,MADHURA BHANDE,ROZAT SHAFIUDDIN AKOLAWALA,FAISAL SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHA., THR. ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECY., DEPT. OF TRANSPORT AND PORTS, MUMBAI AND ORS.

  2. 2.MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THR. VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, MUMBAI

  3. 3.GENERAL MANAGER (CONSTRUCTION), MSRTC, MUMBAI

  4. 4.THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MSRTC, YAVATMAL

  5. 5.THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MSRTC AKOLA

  6. 6.THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MSRTC, NAGPUR

  7. 7.THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MSRTC, BHANDARA

  8. 8.THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MSRTC, WARHDA

  9. 9.THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MSRTC CHANDRAPUR

  10. 10.THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, MSRTC, AMRAVATI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-May-2026

    —

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench disposed of the petitioner's challenge to show cause notices issued by respondents 4 and 5, directing them to decide the notices after considering the petitioner's detailed reply on merits with a hearing opportunity. If the final order is adverse, it shall be kept in abeyance for 15 days to allow the petitioner to challenge it before appropriate forums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3950/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench disposed of the petitioner's challenge to show cause notices issued by respondents 4 and 5, directing them to decide the notices after considering the petitioner's detailed reply on merits with a hearing opportunity. If the final order is adverse, it shall be kept in abeyance for 15 days to allow the petitioner to challenge it before appropriate forums. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case