VIJAYALAXMI W/O RAMANRAO BOLLA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO PS MAUDA NAGPUR — APPP/1622/2026

Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc). Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040156862026

Filing Number

APPP/5036/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

APPP/1622/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Nerlikar

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYALAXMI W/O RAMANRAO BOLLA

    Adv. MITISHA S. KOTECHA,YASH ABHAY KULLARWAR,YASH ABHAY KULLARWAR, ,M. ANILKUMAR SHANKARLAL,DISHA CHANDAN KAMWANI,YASH ABHAY KULLARWAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PSO PS (Police Station) MAUDA NAGPUR

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. NerlikarView PDF

    Case Summary: APPP/1622/2026 Vijayalaxmi Ramanrao Bolla sought relaxation of a bail condition requiring her to report to the Economic Offence Wing, Nagpur Rural on the 1st and 15th of every month. The court modified the condition, replacing fixed bi-monthly reporting with attendance "as and when called by the Investigating Officer," citing the applicant's consistent compliance over 1.5 years and the changed circumstances making the rigid schedule unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. APPP/1622/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: APPP/1622/2026 Vijayalaxmi Ramanrao Bolla sought relaxation of a bail condition requiring her to report to the Economic Offence Wing, Nagpur Rural on the 1st and 15th of every month. The court modified the condition, replacing fixed bi-monthly reporting with attendance "as and when called by the Investigating Officer," citing the applicant's consistent compliance over 1.5 years and the changed circumstances making the rigid schedule unnecessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case