RITA W/O. SANTOSH PACHERIWALA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRIN. SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/4145/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM040155882026
Filing Number
WP/10585/2026
Filing Date
05-May-2026
Registration No
WP/4145/2026
Registration Date
13-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RITA W/O. SANTOSH PACHERIWALA AND ANOTHER
Adv. HARNISH RAJESH GADHIA,VEDANT NARSING SARDA,VEDANT NARSING SARDA, ,ANIKET SAWAL,MAYUR RAJESH GADHIA,VEDANT NARSING SARDA
-
2.SHYAMSUNDER GAJANAN AGRAWAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRIN. SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS.
-
2.THE COLLECTOR AND COMPETENT AUTHRITY, URBAN LAND CEILING, NAGPUR
-
3.THE TAHSILDAR, HINGNA, NAGPUR
Case History
-
20-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Jul-2026
Fresh Admission (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
-
08-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
In WP 4145/2026, the High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard the petitioners' counsel on 08.06.2026. The Court issued notice to the respondents returnable on 20th July 2026, with the AGP waiving service of notice on behalf of respondent nos.1-3 (State). The case was adjourned for further hearing; office objections are to be removed before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/4145/2026
In WP 4145/2026, the High Court of Bombay (Nagpur Bench) heard the petitioners' counsel on 08.06.2026. The Court issued notice to the respondents returnable on 20th July 2026, with the AGP waiving service of notice on behalf of respondent nos.1-3 (State). The case was adjourned for further hearing; office objections are to be removed before the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts