NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THR. PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, NANDED vs MADHAV MUKINDA YENKAR AND OTHERS Advocate - RAHUL S. KUREKAR, (FOR R 1 AND — HCBM40155882025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 34,37.
CNR: HCBM040155882025
e-Filing Number
07-05-2025
Filing Number
AA/11388/2025
Filing Date
08-May-2025
Judge
Registrar (Judicial)
Coram
Registrar (Judicial)
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THR. PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT, NANDED
Adv. ANISH ANAND KATHANE,NIRANJAN S. JADHAV,NIRANJAN S. JADHAV, ,ANKIT ANAND KATHANE,VIDHI VERMA,NIRANJAN S. JADHAV
Respondent(s)
-
1.MADHAV MUKINDA YENKAR AND OTHERS Advocate - RAHUL S. KUREKAR, (FOR R 1 AND
-
2.WAMAN MUKINDA YENKAR
-
3.COMPETENT AUTHORITY (LAND ACQUISITION), S.D.O., MAHAGAON, YAVATMAL
-
4.THE ARBITRATOR (ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR), YAVATMAL
-
5.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. COLLECTOR, YAVATMAL
-
6.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR NHAI, MUMBAI
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
07-May-2026
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
In this Arbitration Appeal before the Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench between the National Highways Authority of India and Madhav Mukinda Yenkar, the court granted a two-week adjournment as a final opportunity to the parties to resolve the matter or submit additional submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
05-Mar-2026
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
For Orders
Registrar (Judicial)
-
20-Nov-2025
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
20-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-May-2025
Case filed
In this Arbitration Appeal before the Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench between the National Highways Authority of India and Madhav Mukinda Yenkar, the court granted a two-week adjournment as a final opportunity to the parties to resolve the matter or submit additional submissions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts