NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THR. PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT- NANDED vs DAGADU VITHOBA JADHAV AND OTHERS — HCBM40155812025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 34,37.
CNR: HCBM040155812025
e-Filing Number
07-05-2025
Filing Number
AA/11384/2025
Filing Date
08-May-2025
Judge
Registrar (Judicial)
Coram
Registrar (Judicial)
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA THR. PROJECT DIRECTOR, IMPLEMENTATION UNIT- NANDED
Adv. ANISH ANAND KATHANE
Respondent(s)
-
1.DAGADU VITHOBA JADHAV AND OTHERS
-
2.COMPETENT AUTHORITY / LAND ACQUISITION, MAHAGAON, YAVATMAL
-
3.THE ARBITRATOR / ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, YAVATMAL
-
4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. COLLECTOR, YAVATMAL
-
5.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. NHAI, MUMBAI
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
07-May-2026
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
In this Arbitration Appeal before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, the National Highways Authority of India challenged an arbitrator's award in a land acquisition dispute with Dagadu Vithoba Jadhav and others. The court adjourned the matter on May 7, 2026, granting the parties two weeks as a final opportunity to comply with procedural requirements before substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
For Orders -
Registrar (Judicial)
-
05-Mar-2026
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
For Orders
Registrar (Judicial)
-
20-Nov-2025
Registrar (Judicial)View PDF
-
20-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-May-2025
Case filed
In this Arbitration Appeal before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur, the National Highways Authority of India challenged an arbitrator's award in a land acquisition dispute with Dagadu Vithoba Jadhav and others. The court adjourned the matter on May 7, 2026, granting the parties two weeks as a final opportunity to comply with procedural requirements before substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts