M/S RAHUL PROPERTIES, NAGPUR, THR. ITS PARTNER, GAURAV A. AGARWALA vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRIN. SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/3958/2026

Case under Urban Land Cc & Rd Act 1976 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 27-May-2026

CNR: HCBM040155322026

Filing Number

WP/10539/2026

Filing Date

04-May-2026

Registration No

WP/3958/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Urban Land Cc & Rd Act 1976 Section 226
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S RAHUL PROPERTIES, NAGPUR, THR. ITS PARTNER, GAURAV A. AGARWALA

    Adv. KARTIK N SHUKUL,RAGHAV N. TIWARI,RAGHAV N. TIWARI, ,RAGHAV N. TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRIN. SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS.

  2. 2.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR SECRETARY, MUMBAI

  3. 3.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR ITS SECRETARY, MUMBAI

  4. 4.COLLECTOR, NAGPUR

  5. 5.NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST THR, ITS CHAIRMAN, NAGPUR

  6. 6.NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THR ITS COMMISSIONER, NAGPUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-May-2026

    —

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 3958/2026 The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court disposed of M/s Rahul Properties' petition seeking relief for non-compliance with a 2004 order under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The petitioner claimed inability to comply due to unavoidable circumstances and had submitted a representation on 27.03.2026 for exemption from extension charges, which remained undecided. The court directed the State Government to decide the representation within four weeks, noting that government resolutions empower the State to exempt extension charges in befitting cases and the petitioner's pending representation required timely assessment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 04-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3958/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 3958/2026 The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court disposed of M/s Rahul Properties' petition seeking relief for non-compliance with a 2004 order under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The petitioner claimed inability to comply due to unavoidable circumstances and had submitted a representation on 27.03.2026 for exemption from extension charges, which remained undecided. The court directed the State Government to decide the representation within four weeks, noting that government resolutions empower the State to exempt extension charges in befitting cases and the petitioner's pending representation required timely assessment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case