SHAKUNTALA RAVINDRA WASNIK vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH HOME SECRETARY — WP/358/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section Article226227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040154922026
e-Filing Number
03-05-2026
Filing Number
WP/4976/2026
Filing Date
04-May-2026
Registration No
WP/358/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta
Bench Type
Division
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAKUNTALA RAVINDRA WASNIK
Adv. GANESH HEMRAJJI BARANGE,BALRAM V. GUPTA,BALRAM V. GUPTA, ,P. P. KOTWAL,PRASHANT S. VERMA,BALRAM V. GUPTA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH HOME SECRETARY
-
2.COMMISSIONER OF POLICE NAGPUR CITY
-
3.POLICE STATION OFFICER JARIPATKA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
22-May-2026
—
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke,hon'ble Justice Nivedita Prakash MehtaView PDF
The High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition seeking directions to register an FIR and arrest accused persons in a property dispute case. The court found that adequate alternative remedies existed under Section 173(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, allowing the petitioner to approach the Superintendent of Police or Magistrate directly, and therefore declined to entertain the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/358/2026
The High Court dismissed the petitioner's writ petition seeking directions to register an FIR and arrest accused persons in a property dispute case. The court found that adequate alternative remedies existed under Section 173(4) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, allowing the petitioner to approach the Superintendent of Police or Magistrate directly, and therefore declined to entertain the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts