SAU. JAYASHREE W/O BHIMRAO TAMGADGE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. THE COLLECTOR, NAGPUR AND ANOTHER — WP/4142/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section 226. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040153762026

Filing Number

WP/10443/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

WP/4142/2026

Registration Date

13-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section 226
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAU. JAYASHREE W/O BHIMRAO TAMGADGE

    Adv. S. D. INGOLE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. THE COLLECTOR, NAGPUR AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.MAHARASHTRA AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD. NAGPUR

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Case Summary: The petitioner sought a direction to grant a rehabilitation plot in Mouza Chinchbhavan, Nagpur, after her land (Plot No.55) was acquired for airport development. The High Court disposed of the petition, directing Maharashtra Airport Development Company Ltd. to treat the petitioner's legal notice as a representation and decide within eight weeks, with the decision communicated to her within two weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Jun-2026

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The petitioner sought a direction to grant a rehabilitation plot in Mouza Chinchbhavan, Nagpur, after her land (Plot No.55) was acquired for airport development. The High Court disposed of the petition, directing Maharashtra Airport Development Company Ltd. to treat the petitioner's legal notice as a representation and decide within eight weeks, with the decision communicated to her within two weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case