SUNIL S/O. RATANLAL GAUTAM vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, FOREST AND REVENUE DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS. — PIL/35/2026
Case under Public Interest Litigation Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040153432026
Filing Number
PIL/10416/2026
Filing Date
02-May-2026
Registration No
PIL/35/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNIL S/O. RATANLAL GAUTAM
Adv. DUJENDRA KUMAR H. SHARMA,VISHAKHA MUKESH MADHWANI,VISHAKHA MUKESH MADHWANI, ,PRATEEK D. SHARMA,SAYLI V. KULKARNI,ADV. PRADYUMNA D. SHARMA,ANUSHREE PANDE,ANJUMAN ABDUL SAMIR SHEIKH,VISHAKHA MUKESH MADHWANI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, FOREST AND REVENUE DEPT., MUMBAI AND ORS.
-
2.MANAGING DIRECTOR, FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF MAHARASHTRA LTD., NAGPUR
-
3.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, FGZ LTD. NAGPUR
-
4.TENDER PROCESS COMMITTEE, FGX LTD., NAGPUR, THR. MEMBER SECRETARY PROJECT MANAGER FGZ LTD., NAGPUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Jun-2026
—
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) permitted the petitioner to withdraw PIL 35/2026 on 7th May 2026, granting liberty to approach respondent authorities with a detailed representation highlighting the alleged irregularities. The court reserved all grounds raised in the PIL for future consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. PIL/35/2026
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) permitted the petitioner to withdraw PIL 35/2026 on 7th May 2026, granting liberty to approach respondent authorities with a detailed representation highlighting the alleged irregularities. The court reserved all grounds raised in the PIL for future consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts