RAMESH KRUSHNAJI DHORE vs STATE OF MAH. THR.COMMISSIONER STATE EXCISE AND PROHIBITION DEPT. MAH. STATE, FORT, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/4086/2026

Case under Bombay Prohibition Act Section 226,227. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040153072026

Filing Number

WP/10394/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

WP/4086/2026

Registration Date

08-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Prohibition Act Section 226,227
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH KRUSHNAJI DHORE

    Adv. BHUPESH WAMANRAO PATIL,SUYOG S. SHRIRAME,SUYOG S. SHRIRAME, ,RAJU P. MALVIYA,AKANKSHA RAJU MESHRAM,SAMIKSHA RAMESH KAMBLE,SUYOG S. SHRIRAME

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAH. THR.COMMISSIONER STATE EXCISE AND PROHIBITION DEPT. MAH. STATE, FORT, MUMBAI AND ORS.

  2. 2.THE DISTRICT, COLLECTOR, CHANDRAPUR

  3. 3.RAMDAS RAMCHANDRA DHORE

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) in Writ Petition No. 4086 of 2026 (Ramesh Krushnaji Dhore v. State of Maharashtra) ordered on 12 June 2026 that the petition be listed before a learned Single Judge. The court found that the impugned order dated 05.02.2025 passed in Appeal No. 377 of 2022 was issued by a Quasi-Judicial Authority under a Local Act, warranting transfer to a Single Judge for appropriate adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Jun-2026

    —

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4086/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) in Writ Petition No. 4086 of 2026 (Ramesh Krushnaji Dhore v. State of Maharashtra) ordered on 12 June 2026 that the petition be listed before a learned Single Judge. The court found that the impugned order dated 05.02.2025 passed in Appeal No. 377 of 2022 was issued by a Quasi-Judicial Authority under a Local Act, warranting transfer to a Single Judge for appropriate adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case