VISHNU S/O RAJARAM VAIRAGADE vs STATE OF MAH., THR. CHIEF SECRETARY, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/4089/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040152962026

Filing Number

WP/10389/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

WP/4089/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226
Public Records Act (Maharashtra)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISHNU S/O RAJARAM VAIRAGADE

    Adv. RAHUL S. KUREKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAH., THR. CHIEF SECRETARY, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI AND ORS.

  2. 2.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MEDICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

  3. 3.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

  4. 4.COMMISSIONER/ COMPETENT OFFICER, COMMON ENTRANCE TEST MEDICAL, STATE OF MAHA.

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/4089/2026 Petitioner Vishnu S/O Rajaram Vairagade challenged the non-supply of information by the Public Information Officer (dated 07.11.2025). The High Court Nagpur Bench held that the petitioner has a statutory remedy under Section 19 of the Right to Information Act, 2005, before the First Appellate Authority. The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to pursue the statutory remedy, as requested by petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Jun-2026

    —

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4089/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4089/2026 Petitioner Vishnu S/O Rajaram Vairagade challenged the non-supply of information by the Public Information Officer (dated 07.11.2025). The High Court Nagpur Bench held that the petitioner has a statutory remedy under Section 19 of the Right to Information Act, 2005, before the First Appellate Authority. The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to pursue the statutory remedy, as requested by petitioner's counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case