SMT. SINDHU KRUSHNARAO TALVEKAR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, (URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT), THR. PRIN. SECRETARY AND OTHERS — WP/4090/2026

Case under Mah. Regional Town Planning Act Section 226,227. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040152862026

Filing Number

WP/10382/2026

Filing Date

02-May-2026

Registration No

WP/4090/2026

Registration Date

11-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Regional Town Planning Act Section 226,227
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SMT. SINDHU KRUSHNARAO TALVEKAR

    Adv. DEEPAK YADAVRAO CHATAP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, (URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT), THR. PRIN. SECRETARY AND OTHERS

  2. 2.DIRECTOR OF TOWN PLANNING, MAHARASHTRA STATE

  3. 3.NAGAR PANCHAYAT SELOO, THR. CHIEF OFFICER

  4. 4.JOINT DIRECTOR OF TOWN PLANNING (NAGPUR DIVISION)

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/4090/2026 The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents (State of Maharashtra and others) returnable on 13.07.2026 in the writ petition filed by Smt. Sindhu Krushnarao Talvekar. The petitioner was permitted to serve respondent No.3 (Nagar Panchayat Seloo) by private mode and required to file an affidavit of service by the next date, with a penalty of Rs.500 if not complied with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Jun-2026

    —

  4. 02-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4090/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4090/2026 The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court issued notice to respondents (State of Maharashtra and others) returnable on 13.07.2026 in the writ petition filed by Smt. Sindhu Krushnarao Talvekar. The petitioner was permitted to serve respondent No.3 (Nagar Panchayat Seloo) by private mode and required to file an affidavit of service by the next date, with a penalty of Rs.500 if not complied with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case