SMT. SAVITRI W/O. TUKARAM GEDAM ORS. vs SHRI. AVISHYANTH PANDA, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GADCHIROLI AND ANOTHER — CP/163/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section U/S 12. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM040152542026
e-Filing Number
30-04-2026
Filing Number
CP/10361/2026
Filing Date
02-May-2026
Registration No
CP/163/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. SAVITRI W/O. TUKARAM GEDAM ORS.
Adv. SHRAVAN S. TARAM, ,ROSHAN SHAMRAO WASEKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRI. AVISHYANTH PANDA, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GADCHIROLI AND ANOTHER
-
2.SHRI. SUHAS GADE, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, GADCHIROLI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-May-2026
—
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the contempt petition filed by Smt. Savitri Gedam. The petitioner had alleged that respondent authorities failed to comply with a November 27, 2025 court order requiring them to decide her writ petition within ten weeks. However, the court found that the Zilla Parishad had already issued a decision via communication dated January 19, 2026, thereby complying with the earlier order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CP/163/2026
The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) dismissed the contempt petition filed by Smt. Savitri Gedam. The petitioner had alleged that respondent authorities failed to comply with a November 27, 2025 court order requiring them to decide her writ petition within ten weeks. However, the court found that the Zilla Parishad had already issued a decision via communication dated January 19, 2026, thereby complying with the earlier order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts