VARUN S/O MADHUKAR KHANDARE vs CONTROLLER OF PATENTS, PATENT OFFICE, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER — WP/3956/2026

Case under Patents Act Section 226. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040151962026

Filing Number

WP/10326/2026

Filing Date

30-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/3956/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Patents Act Section 226
Patents Rules 2003
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VARUN S/O MADHUKAR KHANDARE

    Adv. SHAJAL S. SARDA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CONTROLLER OF PATENTS, PATENT OFFICE, MUMBAI AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS, MUMBAI

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission (Civil Side Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

  3. 27-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/3956/2026 Outcome: The writ petition was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents (Controller of Patents and Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs, Mumbai) returnable on 22.06.2026. The petitioner is permitted to serve respondents via private mode in addition to regular service, with an affidavit of service due by the next date or face a Rs. 500 cost penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3956/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/3956/2026 Outcome: The writ petition was adjourned. Notice was issued to respondents (Controller of Patents and Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs, Mumbai) returnable on 22.06.2026. The petitioner is permitted to serve respondents via private mode in addition to regular service, with an affidavit of service due by the next date or face a Rs. 500 cost penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case