VINOD VINAYAKRAO BAKAL AND OTHERS vs SHRI VIJAY V. WAGHMARE, TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, STATE OF MAHA., MUMBAI AND ORS. — CP/165/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 12. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040151422026
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-04-2026
Filing Number
CP/10291/2026
Filing Date
30-04-2026
Registration No
CP/165/2026
Registration Date
05-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL L. PANSARE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJNISH R. VYAS
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL L. PANSARE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJNISH R. VYAS
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VINOD VINAYAKRAO BAKAL AND OTHERS
Adv. ASHWIN RAMRAO INGOLE
DHARAMSING KANIRAM RATHOD
SACHIN SUKHADEO KALPATE
DIPALI RAMDAS ISAL
RAJENDRA MANSARAM MARKHAM
MAKSUD MAHEMUDALI SAYYAD
PRADIP SURAJLAL KUMBHARE
MULCHAND PATIRAM MARSKOLHE
ASHOK MOHALAT MARKAM
SWATI BABUL PAWAR (CHAVHAN)
MALTI SHRIKANT CHAKOLE
SANJAYKUMAR HIRALAL AMBILDUKE
SANDIP GOPICHAND WADHIVE
MAHESH HARILAL FULBEL
CHETAN SUBHASHRAO CHAVHAN
MANOJ KHODKE
MANOHAR VYANKATRAO SONTAKKE
Respondent(s)
SHRI VIJAY V. WAGHMARE, TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, STATE OF MAHA., MUMBAI AND ORS.
SMT AYUSH SINGH, ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, TRIBAL DEVPT., NAGPUR DIVISION
SHRI VIAYAK MAHAMUNI, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, Z.P. NAGPUR
SHRI NIKHIL SHARD BHUYAR, EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY), Z.P. NAGPUR
SHRI VIJAY MADHUKAR BHAKARE, BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, PANCHAYAT SAMITI RAMTEK, NAGPUR
SHRI RAMESH HARICHANDRA KOLAPE, TAHSILDAR, RAMTEK, NAGPUR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL L. PANSARE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJNISH R. VYAS
CONTEMEPT PETITION - FOR ADMISSION (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-05-2026 | |
| 23-06-2026 | CONTEMEPT PETITION - FOR ADMISSION (CIVIL SIDE MATTERS) |
Orders
Summary The Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench dismissed the contempt petition against respondents 1-3 but issued a show-cause notice to respondent No. 4 (CEO, Z.P. Nagpur), directing him to explain why contempt proceedings should not be initiated for allegedly failing to decide the petitioner's representation within three weeks as ordered on 08.05.2025. The matter is returnable in two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench dismissed the contempt petition against respondents 1-3 but issued a show-cause notice to respondent No. 4 (CEO, Z.P. Nagpur), directing him to explain why contempt proceedings should not be initiated for allegedly failing to decide the petitioner's representation within three weeks as ordered on 08.05.2025. The matter is returnable in two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts