VINOD VINAYAKRAO BAKAL AND OTHERS vs SHRI VIJAY V. WAGHMARE, TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, STATE OF MAHA., MUMBAI AND ORS. — CP/165/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 12. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040151422026
e-Filing Number
30-04-2026
Filing Number
CP/10291/2026
Filing Date
30-Apr-2026
Registration No
CP/165/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VINOD VINAYAKRAO BAKAL AND OTHERS
Adv. ASHWIN RAMRAO INGOLE
-
2.DHARAMSING KANIRAM RATHOD
-
3.SACHIN SUKHADEO KALPATE
-
4.DIPALI RAMDAS ISAL
-
5.RAJENDRA MANSARAM MARKHAM
-
6.MAKSUD MAHEMUDALI SAYYAD
-
7.PRADIP SURAJLAL KUMBHARE
-
8.MULCHAND PATIRAM MARSKOLHE
-
9.ASHOK MOHALAT MARKAM
-
10.SWATI BABUL PAWAR (CHAVHAN)
-
11.MALTI SHRIKANT CHAKOLE
-
12.SANJAYKUMAR HIRALAL AMBILDUKE
-
13.SANDIP GOPICHAND WADHIVE
-
14.MAHESH HARILAL FULBEL
-
15.CHETAN SUBHASHRAO CHAVHAN
-
16.MANOJ KHODKE
-
17.MANOHAR VYANKATRAO SONTAKKE
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRI VIJAY V. WAGHMARE, TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, STATE OF MAHA., MUMBAI AND ORS.
-
2.SMT AYUSH SINGH, ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, TRIBAL DEVPT., NAGPUR DIVISION
-
3.SHRI VIAYAK MAHAMUNI, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, Z.P. NAGPUR
-
4.SHRI NIKHIL SHARD BHUYAR, EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY), Z.P. NAGPUR
-
5.SHRI VIJAY MADHUKAR BHAKARE, BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER, PANCHAYAT SAMITI RAMTEK, NAGPUR
-
6.SHRI RAMESH HARICHANDRA KOLAPE, TAHSILDAR, RAMTEK, NAGPUR
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
Contemept Petition - For Admission (Civil Side Matters)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. VyasView PDF
Summary The Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench dismissed the contempt petition against respondents 1-3 but issued a show-cause notice to respondent No. 4 (CEO, Z.P. Nagpur), directing him to explain why contempt proceedings should not be initiated for allegedly failing to decide the petitioner's representation within three weeks as ordered on 08.05.2025. The matter is returnable in two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CP/165/2026
Summary The Bombay High Court's Nagpur Bench dismissed the contempt petition against respondents 1-3 but issued a show-cause notice to respondent No. 4 (CEO, Z.P. Nagpur), directing him to explain why contempt proceedings should not be initiated for allegedly failing to decide the petitioner's representation within three weeks as ordered on 08.05.2025. The matter is returnable in two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts