SMT. KALPANA NAVNATH BADODE vs COMMISSIONER, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN (KVS), NEW DELHI AND OTHERS — WP/3756/2026
Case under The Central Administrative Tribunal Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM040150342026
Next Hearing
16th May 2026
Filing Number
WP/10221/2026
Filing Date
29-04-2026
Registration No
WP/3756/2026
Registration Date
02-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SMT. KALPANA NAVNATH BADODE
Adv. DR. ANAND KUMAR
Respondent(s)
COMMISSIONER, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN (KVS), NEW DELHI AND OTHERS
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KVS REGIONAL OFFICE, MUMBAI
PRINCIPAL, KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA, MUMBAI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL S. KILOR , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAJ D. WAKODE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/3756/2026 The High Court dismissed Smt. Kalpana Navnath Badode's petition challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's rejection of her HRA (House Rent Allowance) and guest room reimbursement claims. The court held that under the December 30, 2022 Finance Ministry guidelines, HRA entitlement requires an employee to have formally applied for government residential quarters; the petitioner failed to produce documentary evidence of such an application, and guest house charges cannot substitute for this requirement. The petition was dismissed as lacking merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/3756/2026 The High Court dismissed Smt. Kalpana Navnath Badode's petition challenging the Central Administrative Tribunal's rejection of her HRA (House Rent Allowance) and guest room reimbursement claims. The court held that under the December 30, 2022 Finance Ministry guidelines, HRA entitlement requires an employee to have formally applied for government residential quarters; the petitioner failed to produce documentary evidence of such an application, and guest house charges cannot substitute for this requirement. The petition was dismissed as lacking merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts