STATE OF MAHARASHTRA PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DAIRY DEVT AND FISH. MUMBAI vs MANOHAR GOPALRAO LAYSE — CAW/1070/2026

Case under Other Act Section 00. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-May-2026

CNR: HCBM040148642026

Filing Number

CAW/10104/2026

Filing Date

29-Apr-2026

Registration No

CAW/1070/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Other Act Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPT OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DAIRY DEVT AND FISH. MUMBAI

    Adv. GOVERNMENT PLEADER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANOHAR GOPALRAO LAYSE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court dismissed Maharashtra's writ petition challenging the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal's order directing payment of second time-bound promotion benefits to respondent Manohar Gopalrao Layse. The court upheld the tribunal's finding that absence of a promotional Junior Engineer post at Akola actually strengthened rather than negated the respondent's entitlement to time-bound promotional pay under the 2010 Government Resolution, as the scheme was designed precisely for employees unable to secure regular promotion due to post unavailability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    —

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CAW/1070/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court dismissed Maharashtra's writ petition challenging the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal's order directing payment of second time-bound promotion benefits to respondent Manohar Gopalrao Layse. The court upheld the tribunal's finding that absence of a promotional Junior Engineer post at Akola actually strengthened rather than negated the respondent's entitlement to time-bound promotional pay under the 2010 Government Resolution, as the scheme was designed precisely for employees unable to secure regular promotion due to post unavailability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case