RAJESH MUKHRU DHONGADE vs THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, CHANDRAPUR AND ANOTHER — WP/4532/2026

Case under The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section 226,227. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

Next hearing 23-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM040148252026

Filing Number

WP/10066/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/4532/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare , Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. Vyas

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section 226,227
Constitution of India
Service Matter

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH MUKHRU DHONGADE

    Adv. PRADEEP SHANTARAM KSHIRSAGAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ZILLA PARISHAD, CHANDRAPUR AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, CHANDRAPUR

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-Jun-2026

    —

  3. 23-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil L. Pansare,hon'ble Shri Justice Rajnish R. VyasView PDF

    Case Summary: In WP 4532/2026, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) issued notice to respondents on 09-06-2026, with the case returnable on 23-06-2026. The Court permitted the petitioner to serve respondents through all permissible modes including speed post and directed filing of an affidavit of service. The matter is at the notice stage pending substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4532/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WP 4532/2026, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) issued notice to respondents on 09-06-2026, with the case returnable on 23-06-2026. The Court permitted the petitioner to serve respondents through all permissible modes including speed post and directed filing of an affidavit of service. The matter is at the notice stage pending substantive hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case