MAULI BAHUUDESHIYE SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, GANESHPUR, THR. SECRETARY AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, MUMBAI AND OTHERS — WP/3674/2026

Case under The Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Act2009 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-May-2026

CNR: HCBM040147412026

Filing Number

WP/10011/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/3674/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Act2009 Section 226
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAULI BAHUUDESHIYE SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, GANESHPUR, THR. SECRETARY AND ANOTHER

    Adv. HRISHIKESH S CHITALEY,MEET KISHOR THAKKAR,MEET KISHOR THAKKAR, ,ABHINAV PRASHANT VYAS,SANKET MANOJ JOSHI,HARSHAD H. JICHKAR,ABHIMANYU MENON,REWATI S. CHITALEY,MEET KISHOR THAKKAR

  2. 2.MAULI ENGLISH LAKHANI BHANDARA, THR. PRINCIPAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, MUMBAI AND OTHERS

  2. 2.MAHARASHTRA PRATHMIK SHIKSHAN PARISHAD, THR. DIRECTOR, MUMBAI

  3. 3.THE DIRECTOR OF PRIMARY EDUCATION STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, PUNE

  4. 4.THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION, STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, PUNE

  5. 5.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION NAGPUR DIVISION, NAGPUR

  6. 6.THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, BHANDARA

  7. 7.UNION OF INDIA THR. SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT DELHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-May-2026

    —

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court directed state authorities to scrutinize the petitioner school's eligibility for RTE Act reimbursement benefits within four weeks, following similar precedent decisions. If eligible, outstanding fees for students admitted under 25% RTE quota must be reimbursed within twelve weeks; if ineligible, reasons must be communicated within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3674/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Nagpur Bench of Bombay High Court directed state authorities to scrutinize the petitioner school's eligibility for RTE Act reimbursement benefits within four weeks, following similar precedent decisions. If eligible, outstanding fees for students admitted under 25% RTE quota must be reimbursed within twelve weeks; if ineligible, reasons must be communicated within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case