BAHUUDDESHIYA VIKAS SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, SANGADI, THR. PRESIDENT AND ANR. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, MUMBAI AND ORS. — WP/3669/2026

Case under The Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Act2009 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-May-2026

CNR: HCBM040147362026

Filing Number

WP/10006/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/3669/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor , Hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. Wakode

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Act2009 Section 226
Constitution of India

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAHUUDDESHIYA VIKAS SHIKSHAN SANSTHA, SANGADI, THR. PRESIDENT AND ANR.

    Adv. HRISHIKESH S CHITALEY,MEET KISHOR THAKKAR,MEET KISHOR THAKKAR, ,ABHINAV PRASHANT VYAS,SANKET MANOJ JOSHI,HARSHAD H. JICHKAR,ABHIMANYU MENON,REWATI S. CHITALEY,MEET KISHOR THAKKAR

  2. 2.DEZY ENGLISH SCHOOL, THR. ITS PRINCIPAL, SANGADI, BHANDARA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. SECRETARY, DEPT. OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, MUMBAI AND ORS.

  2. 2.MAHARASHTRA PRATHMIK SHIKSHAN PARISHAD, THR ITS DIRECTOR, MUMBAI

  3. 3.THE DIRECTOR OF PRIMARY EDUCATION, PUNE

  4. 4.THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION, PUNE

  5. 5.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, NAGPUR

  6. 6.THE EDUCATION OFFICER, (PRIMARY), ZILLA PARISHAD, BHANDARA

  7. 7.THE UNION OF INDIA THR, ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCE, DELHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-May-2026

    —

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor,hon'ble Shri Justice Raj D. WakodeView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) directed authorities to scrutinize the petitioner schools' eligibility for RTE Act fee reimbursement within four weeks and determine the quantum owed for students admitted under the 25% RTE quota. If eligible, reimbursement must be made within twelve weeks; if ineligible, reasons must be communicated within two weeks. The court relied on similar earlier judgments (WP 2819/2021 and WP 5825-5827/2024) in disposing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/3669/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) directed authorities to scrutinize the petitioner schools' eligibility for RTE Act fee reimbursement within four weeks and determine the quantum owed for students admitted under the 25% RTE quota. If eligible, reimbursement must be made within twelve weeks; if ineligible, reasons must be communicated within two weeks. The court relied on similar earlier judgments (WP 2819/2021 and WP 5825-5827/2024) in disposing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case